|
Oct
27
Boro Champs Results
Favor the Rankings
of the Curtis Girls and Top Three Boys Teams
The Rankings;
BOYS
- Midwood
- McKee SI Tech
- Curtis
- Tottenville
- Clintn
- Stuyvesant
- Bayside
- Bronx Science
- Hunter
- Port Richmond
GIRLS
- McKee SI Tech
- T Harris
- Curtis
- Tottenville
- Boys and Girls
- Port Richmond
- AP Randolph
- Hunter
- Stuyvesant
- Clinton
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oct
20
The boys from Midwood and Curtis were only far apart
geographically this weekend. In ability, they are thisclose. At the
Nassau County Invitational in Bethpage State Park, LI, Midwood finished
their five scorers within 35 seconds of each other over 5000 meters.
They convincingly won the seeded “A” race with 36 points. Curtis,
competing at the same time in the second seeded “B” race of the
Eastern States Championship at Van Cortlandt Park was taking a very
respectable tenth place. Among the teams that finished behind them was
the city’s number one ranked squad from Msgr. Farrell.
The Tottenville and McKee SI Tech boys traveled to Rhode Island
to compete in the championship section of the Brown U. Invitational.
Tottenville is a team capable of running very well or very badly. This
time they ran very well, losing to the higher ranked MSIT by only one
place. When Tottenville’s first JV runner is inserted into the results
the two teams sit virtually dead even.
The Bronx Science boys moved from number nine to five this week
by putting nearly all five scorers under 15-minutes in the ESC.
Conversely, the Clinton boys, in the ESC, mysteriously running again
without their number one man, fell from number five to eight.
The story on the girl’s side ignores McKee SI Tech, Townsend
Harris and Tottenville, ranked respectively one through three. Their
performances this weekend continue to justify that order. Boys and Girls
and Curtis however showed some impressive growth.
The girls from Boys and Girls, based on their work in the Fordham
U. meet at VCP, jump all the way from number nine to four. This team is
on the move and will be even better later, when its speedy freshmen,
Adrenee Sterrett, joins the varsity.
Curtis HS, previously defined as essentially a great runner (Jonetta
Moore) without a viable team, suddenly is a team. Results from the
Fordham U. meet show all five Curtis girls finishing under 20-minutes
for the first time this season. What a difference that makes in the
standings. After previously hanging on at ninth place the Warriors are
now firmly in the middle of the pack, at number six.
The
rankings:
BOYS
1.
Midwood
2.
Curtis
3.
McKee SI Tech
4.
Tottenville
5.
Bronx Science
6.
Stuyvesant
7.
G. Washington
8.
Clinton
9.
Port Richmond
10.
Bayside
GIRLS
Oct
13
The PSAL team results from this weekend’s Manhattan College
Invitational at Van Cortlandt Park in the Bronx show a very different
picture depending on where one looks. The talent of the ranked boys
teams doesn’t vary very greatly throughout. The ranked girls teams, on
the other hand, shows strength at the top and a significant drop off
after that.
Last week’s number one
boys team, Midwood keeps its position, barely holding off Curtis. These
two teams are essentially tied in a “virtual reality” dual meet.
Midwood’s stronger back runners counter Curtis’s star Maurice
Harewood. (Harewood’s 13:38.4 time was the best of the PSAL on
Saturday.) The middle scorers from both teams will carry the day in a
face-to-face showdown.
Not far off these leaders
are three teams that need only to “put it all together” at the right
time. This week McKee SI Tech holds on to #3 while Clinton moves to #4
based on a performance that was a bit better than that of Tottenville on
Saturday.
The ranked girls teams are
clearly in a class society. McKee SI Tech is the upper crust. Townsend
Harris is in that strata too, but a notch below. Harris was unable to
outscore Tech at Manhattan, even with the Seagulls’ number two runner
not finishing. Tottenville stands alone at number three, in a class by
itself, not upper crust, but not bourgeoisie either. The Pirates had a
good day at Manhattan. They were actually the only PSAL school to finish
teams in the top ten in three different races. Unfortunately none were
on the varsity level. They are at least a year away from Harris and
Tech.
Port Richmond, Stuyvesant
and AP Randolph are the middle ranked teams, in this order at numbers
four, five and six. APR seems to be accelerating most among the three.
The appearance of middle distance star Selina Sappleton for the first
time this season, gives APR that edge. This week’s rankings:
BOYS TEAMS
- Midwood
- Curtis
- McKee SI Tech
- Clinton
- Tottenville
- Stuyvesant
- Bayside
- G. Washington
- Bronx Science
- Port Richmond
GIRLS TEAMS
- McKee SI Tech
- T. Harris
- Tottenville
- Port Richmond
- Stuyvesant
- AP Randolph
- Boys and Girls
- Hunter
- Clinton
- Bronx Science
Oct
6
The PSAL’s top ranking boys
and girls cross country teams seem
to have locked themselves into position. As the first month of
competition has come to an end, the Midwood boys and the McKee SI Tech
girls are stubbornly holding on to number one slots.
Not so firm are the holds
of the next few teams after Midwood and Tech. Will the SI boys teams,
Tottenville, Curtis and McKee SI Tech,in places two through four, ever
finally sort themselves out? Tech
was the early season leader, but hasn’t run as strong since.
Tottenville was steadily getting better all September, until its
pedestrian showing this weekend at Sunken Meadow. Is Curtis, so full of
promise on paper, just a great write hope?
The
Clinton and Washington boys were the most aggressive teams this past
week, and comsequently earned their new five and six positions. The rest
of the top ten showed enough consistency to remain in the top ten.
The ledger on the
girls side has a bit of a different twist. MSIT remains the class of the
league, with runner-up Harris harboring realistic hopes of dethroning.
Tottenville, at three, and Boys and Girls at four, each get better every
outing, but can't match Tech or Harris yet.
The most interesting story on the girls chart is APR. Coach
Phyllis Anderson's girls were overloooked in earlier polls, but can't be
ignored any longer. They are a solid number seven in their first
appearencein the top ten. This team has been energized by the fine
running of a cross country newcomer with a well-known name, Dana Lewis.
Currently a senior, Lewis was the top runner in the PSAL as a freshman,
and has only recently seems to have put behind her a series of injuries
that hobbled her during her middle years of high school.
BOYS TEAMS
1
Midwood
2
Tottenville
3. Curtis
4. McKee SI Tech
5. Clinton
6. George Washington
7. Stuyvesant
8. Bayside
9. Jefferson
10. Bronx Science
GIRLS TEAMS
1
McKee SI Tech
2
T. Harris
3
Tottenville
4
Boys and Girls
5
Stuyvesant
6
Port Richmond
7
AP Randolph
8
Jamaica
9
Clinton
10. Bronx
Science
________________________________________
Sep
30
The twelve races
at this weekend’s PSAL Invitational at Van Cortlandt, brought
together, for the first time this season, the entire league. Many
questions were answered, but not all of them.
Clearly, the Midwood boys
were the best team of the day, THAT DAY! Coach Sean Rice’s boys
muscled out the previous poll leader in overall team average, BUT! There
is room still, for debate.
The
two teams did not face each other in the same race. Tech was without
their top runner. In answer, Midwood was not a fully-manned team either.
Midwood was also, in the words of Rice, “training through this
meet.”
This
polls’ second best team, Tottenville, which had been slowly gaining
respect over the last few weeks, proved it is no mirage. The Pirates
move into number two narrowly edging two fine challengers in Curtis and
MSIT. The Warriors and Seagulls now sit in numbers 3 and 4 this week.
Biggest
surprise among ranked boys teams is the rise of George Washington, Bronx
Science and Jefferson. Port Richmond, along with Newtown and Edison, are
all no longer top ten teams.
The
team leader of the girls, MSIT, proved what all had suspected. Coach
Mary Brooks’ team had too much depth and talent for their opponents in
this Invitational. Winners of Varsity, JV and Frosh races they are,
without debate, at this time the league’s top girls team, and program!
The
rebuilding year that the Tottenville girls team was supposed to have
under rookie coach Mickey Lopez isn’t going to be. The Pirates are
very close, (in slot three), behind last year’s champs, Harris. Nine
of the ranked girls teams were present on the chart last week, only
Hunter disappeared. Boys and Girls replaces the Hawks at number five.
The tenth position on the pole was most-hard fought with Midwood
finishing only slightly ahead of a fast-developing Far Rockaway team.
BOYS
TEAMS
1.
Midwood
2.
Tottenville
3.
Curtis
4.
McKee SI Tech
5.
Stuyvesant
6.
Bayside
7.
Jefferson
8.
Bronx Science
9.
Clinton
10.
G. Washington
GIRLS TEAMS
1. McKee SI Tech
2. T. Harris
3. Tottenville
4. Port Richmond
5. Boys and Girls
6. Stuyvesant
7. Bronx Science
8. Clinton
9. Jamaica
10. Midwood
-------------------------------------
Sep
16
Meet
results this past weekend forced some serious rearrangement of the
rankings of both the PSAL boys and girls teams, most notably at the
number one positions. The previously number one-ranked Clinton boys,
despite showing expected strength in their Boro Group Run, have to be
moved aside for the precocious McKee SI Tech squad. Tech was just too
strong against major competition at the Jim Smith Invitational on
Saturday at Sunken Meadow, not to be given this kind of respect.
In head-to-head competition between
the previous number two team, Curtis and number ten, Tottenville, the
latter clearly dominated. As a result, Tottenville moves from ten to
three in making the biggest jump of all ranked teams. Midwood, also
present at Jim Smith also looks somewhat stronger than Curtis and
assumes position number four.
Bayside, proved that they are the real thing in the Queens Boro
Group Run and climbs from nine to six. Stuyvesant, previously considered
only a potential top ten team, showed quality as well as quantity in
their Boro GR and enters the top ten as number seven.
The girl’s new leader, Curtis, may
have three of the top half dozen PSAL runners in the city. McKee SI
Tech, last week’s leader cannot match this. Nor can Harris the leader
at the season’s start. These three teams are not only at the top; they
appear to be a class apart from the rest of the league.
Places four through ten present
interesting teams, all with wild possibilities. Arguments could be made
for revising the position of any one of these teams for any number of
reasons; potential, (Bronx Science, Stuyvesant and Port Richmond),
tradition, (Hunter and Tottenville) and talent, (Clinton and Truman).
The only new names on the girls list
are those of Bronx Science and Stuyvesant.
| Boys
Teams |
Girls
Teams |
| 1 McKee
SI Tech |
1 Curtis |
| 2 Clinton |
2 Townsend
Harris |
| 3 Tottenville |
3 McKee
SI Tech |
| 4 Midwood |
4
Tottenville |
| 5 Curtis |
5 Port
Richmond |
| 6 Bayside |
6 Clinton |
| 7 Stuyvesant |
7 Bronx
Scienc
e |
| 8 South
Shore |
8 Stuyvesant |
| 9 Bronx
Science |
9 Truman |
| 10 Jefferson |
10 Hunter |
Sept
9
Seven PSAL teams chose to open their seasons this weekend at the Wagner
College Invitational, at Clove Lake Park on Staten Island. The results
only mildly shuffled the weekly rankings.
Most significant was the performance of the McKee SI Tech girls.
Coach Mary Brooks’ team managed to eke out a one point advantage over
last year’s CHSAA cross country champion, St John Villa, Staten
Island. Tech and Villa finished 2-3 behind winner Pearl River from
Orange County. Until last week’s leader, Townsend Harris, proves it
can run as well, MSIT should be considered the class of the PSAL
Other girls teams that made debuts included Tottenville, Petrides
and Port Richmond. Tottenville and Port Richmond ran about as expected,
and will hold positions among the top ten.
The
boy’s results showed a MSIT team a little weaker than previously
considered, and a much weaker Tottenville team. Both schools ran
under-manned however and promise better days. Port
Richmond, fielding a full team, showed long-shot possibilities for
future top ten ranking.
| Boys
Teams |
Girls
Team |
| 1.
Clinton |
1.
McKee SI Tech |
| 2.
Curtis |
2.
Townsend Harris |
| 3.
McKee SI Tech |
3.
Curtis |
| 4.
Midwood |
4.
Clinton |
| 5.
Jefferson |
5.
Tottenville |
| 6.
South Shore |
6.
Port Richmond |
| 7.
Erasmus Hall |
7.
Brooklyn Tech |
| 8.
Boys and Girls |
8.
HS Truman |
| 9.
Bayside |
9.
Hunter |
| 10.
Tottenville |
10.
Boys and Girls |
Preseason
The season’s first cross country team rankings are usually
interesting, always iffy and guaranteed to generate controversy.
This is perhaps more true of the first
boys’ poll than the girls’. Clinton, Curtis and McKee SI Tech
each has a rightful claim at the top spot. Clinton’s experience gives
them the nod over the youth and enthusiasm of Cutis and MSIT.
The next places are also a tight trio. Like Clinton, Midwood’s
experience places them slightly ahead of Jefferson and Tottenville. The
rest of the top ten include a bit of the old in South Shore and Boys and
Girls and two fresh faces in Bayside and Erasmus Hall.
Other teams, though not in
the top ten, which deserve consideration include AP Randolph, Bronx
Science, Stuyvesant and George Washington. These “ good” teams
appear to be only a runner or three shy of being able to contend.
On the girls side charting
the top ten is even more subjective. At this point it seems that only
Townsend Harris, Curtis and McKee SI Tech have justifiable hopes for the
top spot. Harris and Curtis were only slightly diminished by
graduations. MSIT, even
less than that. Someone has to beat last year’s city champion Harris
before they should be dislodged from #1. A more mature Curtis team
deserves the initial rankings edge over the younger MSIT girls.
The next four places see a
Port Richmond varsity, heavy with underclassmen that have had varsity
experience since their freshman year vying with regrouping teams from
Clinton, Tottenville and Brooklyn Tech. Clinton’s talent and
Tottenville’s numbers place them a bit ahead of the others.
The final vote-getters
among the girls include Hunter, Truman and Boys and Girls. Each gave
evidence of having distance strength among returnees during last
season’s outdoor track campaign.
Other girls teams, not in
then top ten, that may shake dark-horse labels include AP Randolph,
South Shore, Bronx Science and Hunter.
| Boys
Teams |
Girls
Teams |
| 1.Clinton |
1. Townsend
Harris |
| 2. Curtis |
2. Curtis |
| 3. McKee SI
Tech |
3. McKee SI
Tech |
| 4. Midwood |
4. Clinton |
| 5. Jefferson |
5.
Tottenville |
| 6.
Tottenville |
6. Port
Richmond |
| 7. South
Shore |
7. Brooklyn
Tech |
| 8. Erasmus
Hall |
8. HS Truman |
| 9. Boys and
Girls |
9. Hunter |
| 10. Bayside |
10. Boys
and Girls |
|